Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5845 13
Original file (NR5845 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
‘7015. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD

Docket No. NR5845-13
22 November 2015

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 
   

Subj : ae . pein o cuuin
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: {a} 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 23 May 13 w/attachment
(2) Capt M. Jd. B---, JAGC, USN ltr dtd 3 Jui 14

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 13 (“Administrative
Remarks”) entry dated 23 November 2010 (copy at Tab A).

The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Ivins and Sproul, reviewed
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2014, and
pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a, Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ali
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

6b. Inenclosure (2), the officer who issued the contested entry
commented to the effect that it should be removed.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 13 (“Administrative Remarks”) entry dated
23 November 2010.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
‘to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

c, That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file

maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

. Dwrralie/ f. Erin
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.

Ke S. CoS

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13

    Original file (NR3743-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06823-10

    Original file (06823-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (a) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 19 September 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, and the five Entrance National Agency Check (ENTNAC) documents in the Service-Contract folder of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), images...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14

    Original file (NR4745 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4667 14

    Original file (NR4667 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NJP of 15 November 2012. b. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03524-10

    Original file (03524-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 22 July 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1llb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 April 1998. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0955 14

    Original file (NR0955 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14

    Original file (NR5737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13

    Original file (NR0593 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8166 14

    Original file (NR8166 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 10 April to 23 July 2010, 20 December 2010 to 30 December 2011 and 31 December 2011 to 4 August 2012 (copies at Tabs A, B and C, respectively) and his assignment to the Body Composition Program (BCP) from 21 September 2011 to 17 April 2012 (copies of pertinent...